Electrical Safety

Electrical Safety Program Requirements in Canada

Jeff MacKinnon · May 9, 2019 · Leave a Comment

Something that I have been thinking about lately is: What are the electrical safety program requirements in Canada.

OSHA covers all of the USA, and the minimum Electrical Safety Program requirements can be found here – 1910 Subpart S.

In Canada, the Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulations, part VIII mentions written procedures a couple of times, but not very clear if this needs to be an electrical safety program, or just a couple of written checklists.

“the employer shall issue written instructions with respect to the procedures to be followed for the safe performance of that work”
from Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulations

How about the provinces?

The rest of this article will have the various provincial regulations to find out what they say, and how clear they are regarding the requirement of an electrical safety program.

Newfoundland and Labrador

The Occupational Health and Safety Regulations in NL are pretty clear in the assumption that the employer has an electrical safety program in place. They mention it by name in two different places:

Low voltage electrical equipment – 482(2)
- “Where it is not practicable to completely disconnect low voltage electrical equipment, work shall be performed in accordance with an electrical safety program in accordance with a standard acceptable to the minister that… “
Isolation and Lockout – 490(2)
- “Where it is not practicable to completely isolate high voltage electrical equipment an employer shall conduct a formal hazard assessment and develop an electrical safety program that…”

From the NL Occupational Health and Safety Regulations

Newfoundland and Labrador appears to be very clear that they expect employers that interact with electrical equipment to have an electrical safety program. They mention it by name in two places, both having to do with the isolation of electrical equipment.

In section 484(2)(e) they even mention that current diagrams are required. These diagrams, in my opinion, don’t just include the single line, but all control and protection infromation for the equipment. Many times the wiring and schematic diagrams for control panels are not updated after changes.

Nova Scotia

The Nova Scotia Occupational Safety General Regulations Part 11 covers electrical safety, but they don’t mention an electrical safety program specically. In fact, the NS regulations are written in a fashion that makes it seem that working on energized equipment below 750V is NOT hazardous work. You read that correctly. Here is the quote from subsection 125(2)

125 (2) An employer shall ensure that no work is performed on an energized electrical installation rated at greater than 750 v phase to phase unless the competent person performing the work is accompanied by another competent person.
From NS Occupational Safety General Regulations on May 9, 2019

This is crazy! CSA Z462-2018 uses 30V as the threshold for whether the shock hazard exists, and if a shock hazard exists mitigation techniques need to be implemented to lower the risk. The shock protection boundaries start in at 30V in tables 1A and 1B. The only limiting distances mentioned in the NS regulations are for overhead lines, and they start at 750V.

From NS Occupational Safety General Regulations – Subsection 126(4), retrieved May 9, 2019

Prior to the 2018 version of CSA Z462, the threshold voltage was 50V, it was lowered to 30V; the 750V threshold that is implied to be a part of “Hazardous Work” is way too high. Wow.

I’m not done yet.

I have the two provinces that I do the majority of my work in covered. More to come as time allows.

Checklists

Jeff MacKinnon · Feb 15, 2019 · Leave a Comment

Today I’m starting a new-ish feature where I’m publishing a different thought as a twitter audio at least, and maybe a video depending on where I’m located.

This first thought is on checklists, and their importance in every electrical safety program. This came to me, again, when I was meeting with a client and they were getting started developing their electrical safety program. I was there to help them with an arc flash analysis update, and we started talking about the minimum viable electrical safety program.

Some background

To get there, I had to fly and I noticed something that I see every time I fly, but I haven’t thought about in a while, the pilots were doing their checklist. This was a short flight, and these pilots must do the same routine pretty much every day. They know it in and out, but the checklist helps them consiously go through all the steps every time. Its like if you drive the same part of raod often and then one day completely forget drviing it as you go though. You don’t want to space out on routine tasks.

This is where the checklist comes in, with a very routine task you may skip over steps, but with a checklist you make the check as you go through, mentally remembering to do that thing. I recommend that checklists be used for all tasks that are high risk starting out, and then add in non-routine medium risk tasks as the electrical safety program matures. An example of a medium risk task may be changing a 347V ballast at height.

Minimum Viable Checklists

The two checklists that ever electrical safety program should have are:

Energized Electrical Work Permit
Lock-Out-Tag-Out

These checklists allow the worker and manager to manage the hazards associated by those tasks, which are always medium-high risk, to make sure that everyone stays safe.

https://vimeo.com/317462033/

Let me know what you think about this first Daily Musings. If you want to see or hear it live follow me on Twitter and Linkedin. For now I will at least do a live audio to Twitter and maybe a video on Linkedin in the future.

Arc Flash Mitigation techniques – Administrative

Cole Ferguson · Jul 29, 2016 · Leave a Comment

The second to last line of defence with arc flash mitigation, according to the Hierarchy of Hazard Mitigation, is administrative controls. Administrative controls are implemented after a facility is designed and built, and equipment has been purchased and installed. What the administrative controls really boil down to is your electrical safety program. I’ll break down what that is below.

Electrical Safety Program

An electrical safety program is a list of rules and procedures that must be followed by employees working with electrical equipment at your facility. You may already have a safety program in place, but it is important that you have a safety program that is specific to working on energized equipment. I’ve already written a series of articles to help you get started in putting together your own electrical safety program. I’ll highlight a few key parts here with arc flash mitigation in mind.

Standards

There are a few major standards that need to be followed when working with energized equipment. The odds are high that you will need to adhere to one of CSA Z462 (if you’re in Canada), NFPA 70E (if you’re in the United States), or EN 50110 (if you’re just about anywhere in Europe). Broader organizations that produce standards include OSHA, IEC, IEEE, and ANSI. This is in addition to any standards specific to your location, including provincial and state regulations. These standards will have specific guidelines for performing work on electrical equipment (both energized and de-energized), covering everything from work practices to label and PPE selection. All workers should be familiar with the standards. At the very least, the standards should be readily available to read and should be reviewed prior to any job on electrical equipment.

Job Planning/Maintenance Scheduling

Speaking of jobs, another administrative method for arc flash mitigation is job planning meetings. These should take place before a job dealing with energized equipment begins. In general, you want to make sure to plan your jobs and schedule maintenance around the critical operations of the facility. Proper planning can include work procedures such as Lock-Out-Tag-Out. You always want to try to schedule your work so that it can be done when equipment is de-energized. An arc flash cannot occur if there is no electricity. Proper scheduling also has the double whammy effect of ensuring that maintenance on one system does not impact the operation of another system. This leads to higher operational uptime for your facility.
By signing up for our newsletter, you’ll get access to a free Electrical Safety Program planning report, which covers Job Planning in greater detail.

Personnel Training

A major cause of electrical accidents, arc flash being no exception, is untrained workers wearing insufficient PPE. Well trained, well informed workers will be able to properly identify arc flash hazards and assess the risks, thereby reducing the likelihood of an arc flash incident occuring. Job specific training is mandatory before performing any new job. If the job is performed infrequently, establish a set period of time that can pass before it becomes necessary for an employee to repeat the training for that particular job. If it has been at least a year since an employee has performed a task, that employee must be trained again. Something to stress here is diligence: complacency with work can be just much of a hazard as anything else. Everyone should always be up to date on their training for any job.
Another thing that workers should be aware of is clear communication in the workplace. You can find our article on clear communication here.

Closing

Standards, scheduling, and training are just some administrative controls you can implement for arc flash mitigation. As always, thanks for reading!
If you like this post but want some actionable advice, tips and information, check out our newsletter. You can sign up here or below.
By signing up you get a free report on what an Electrical Safety Program is, and how to go about building one at your facility.

Arc Flash Mitigation Techniques – Engineering

Cole Ferguson · Jul 27, 2016 · Leave a Comment

If you can’t eliminate the hazard completely, and you can’t substitute the problem areas of your system with more appropriate methods, then engineering controls are your next best bet for arc flash hazard mitigation. There are many ways that engineering design can mitigate arc flash. You could even argue that every method of arc flash mitigation falls under the category of engineering controls. Today I’ll talk about some of the big ones.

Protection Coordination Study

To begin the process of arc flash mitigation using engineering controls, the first thing to do is a protection coordination study. A protection coordination study is an essential part of arc flash mitigation because it lets you know how your protective devices will react to a fault. The most important part of the protection coordination study tells you how long a fault will be present before a device is tripped: arc flash incident energy is reduced by reducing the amount of time the fault is active. The protection coordination study will allow you to determine whether or not you need to change the the settings of your circuit breakers and relays. This is assuming that your circuit breakers and relays are digital and adjustable. If they are not, you might want to look at substituting them for newer parts.

Virtual Main System

I was going to try to explain a virtual main system, but the folks at Schneider-Electric have summarized it much better than I can, so I’ll just quote them:
“A virtual Main consists of a digital relay and CT’s added to the LV side of a substation transformer and wired to a Fault Breaking overcurrent device (Vacuum C/B) with the ability to use a “Maintenance Switch” to set a lower fault level trip or to use Short time Zone interlocking with the Secondary feeders to allow for faster tripping of the “virtual” main. “
All they’re really saying here is that you have current transformers on the low voltage side of your transformer, and when the CT’s recognize a fault they are wired to trip a breaker on the high voltage side of the transformer, protecting the entire circuit. You can find more information about maintenance switches and zone interlocking in our article on substitution.

Optical Relaying

A conventional mechanical relay might not be enough to protect against arc flash

Optical relays are a relatively new concept. Instead of tripping solely based on overcurrent, optical relays sense the light generated by an arc fault and use that as another trigger for tripping. An optical relay requires both overcurrent and the light generated by an arc fault to trip: the relay will normally not trip if no overcurrent is detected (but it will trip if there is high overcurrent but not light). These optical relays can have tripping times as low as 2.5 ms!

System Grounding

High resistance grounding limits single-line-to-ground fault currents to very low levels. These low current levels translate into low incident energy levels and therefore reduce the risk of an arc flash hazard occurring. From the IEEE Red Book (Std 141-1993, pg 367), “There is no arc flash hazard, as there is with a solidly grounded system, since the fault current is limited to approximately 5 A). You have to be careful if using this method of arc flash mitigation: high resistance grounding doesn’t mitigate arc flash in the case of line-to-line of 3-phase-to-ground faults. Some more information about how high resistance grounding pertains to arc flash can be found here.

Location Design

Where you put your equipment is important.

Location, location, location. The location of equipment is very important. An arc flash causes rapid increases in temperature and as a result, rapid expansion of the materials that the electricity is flowing through. The explosive action of metals being vaporized and rapidly expanding is called an arc blast. Any equipment that has a high risk for arc flash should be placed in your facility in such a way that the effects of the arc flash incident are not magnified by location. For example, if an arc flash takes place in a small area, there is much less space for the energy to dissipate, and the effects of the arc flash will be concentrated. This is something that is more difficult to rectify after a facility has already been constructed, but is something to be considered during the initial design stages of any new building used to house electrical equipment.

So there you have it, five different techniques to consider when looking at arc flash mitigation from an engineering controls: protection coordination studies, virtual mains, optical relays, high resistance grounding, and location. This is by no means an exhaustive list, and an important thing to remember is that your arc flash mitigation techniques will be unique to your facility by necessity. As always, thanks for reading!
If you like this post but want some actionable advice, tips and information, check out ournewsletter. You can sign up here or below.
By signing up you get a free report on what an Electrical Safety Program is, and how to go about building one at your facility.

Arc Flash Mitigation techniques – Elimination

Cole Ferguson · Jul 22, 2016 · Leave a Comment

Arc flash mitigation is important: to ensure the safety of a worker, every possible step must be taken to mitigate the arc flash hazard. Following the generally accepted hierarchy of controls, Elimination is the best way to mitigate an arc flash hazard.

De-Energize Equipment

When thinking about arc flash mitigation, this is the most straightforward way to eliminate an arc flash hazard. Simply de-energize all equipment that is being worked on. Without the possibility for current to flow, an arc flash incident cannot occur. All workplace electrical safety programs should stress that de-energizing equipment before work (such as maintenance) is a necessity. In order to ensure that you your equipment remains de-energized throughout the duration of the work and is not accidentally energized, you need to have appropriate safe working practices in place.

Lock-Out, Tag-Out

Lock-Out, Tag-Out (referred to as LOCO from here on out) is an excellent form of arc flash mitigation used to eliminate the risk of an arc flash incident occurring by ensuring that equipment remains de-energized while it is being worked on. LOCO requires that employees lock and tag the device being worked on so that it is impossible to accidentally turn the device on. The device can only be energized when all employees have removed their lock and tag and have confirmed that the device is ready to be energized again. This procedure does not work when it is necessary to perform work on energized equipment.

Remote Work

Arc flash mitigation would be much better if this work was being done remotely

Sometimes equipment cannot be de-energized for work. When this happens, an arc flash incident cannot be eliminated entirely. With arc flash mitigation, what is most important is eliminating the risk of personnel injury caused by an arc flash incident. In this case it may be necessary to do work remotely. A few examples include:

Sensors can be added to equipment to monitor voltage, current, and temperature so that these readings can be observed on a computer instead of being observed by hand.
Switchgear can be closed remotely.
A remote racking system for racking circuit breakers will remove personnel from the arc flash boundary when inserting or removing breakers.

The best way to execute arc flash mitigation is to eliminate the hazard all together. You can do this by making sure equipment is de-energized for work using procedures such as LOCO. When it is not possible to de-energize, you can perform as much work as possible remotely using specialized equipment like sensors or remote racking systems.
As always, thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this article, sign up for our newsletter for more content like this, and share this article with your colleagues with buttons below. Until next time!